Optimizing Field Calculator Performance For Large Arcgis Datasets

Slow Field Calculator Performance

When working with large geospatial datasets in ArcGIS, users often rely on the Field Calculator to derive new attribute values or update existing columns. However, when dataset size and complexity increases, Field Calculator operations can slow to a crawl, with updates taking hours or even failing to complete. Understanding what causes poor performance and implementing optimization strategies can help users successfully leverage the Field Calculator even for big data analysis.

Causes of Slow Calculation Times

Large Dataset Size

The primary culprit for lengthy Field Calculator execution is a large underlying dataset, particularly one with millions or billions of features. Every row must be evaluated against the calculation logic, so more rows means longer processing. Datasets with nationwide or global coverage often run into this issue. Strategies like querying and partitioning can help.

Complex Formulas

Field Calculator formulas that invoke multiple functions or perform sequential actions on each value also increase processing time per row. Examples include calculating geometry properties like length or area, manipulating strings, and advanced math. Simplifying logic reduces the workload. Intermediate fields can help break down complex steps.

Inefficient Data Storage

How attribute data sits on disk can positively or negatively impact Field Calculator speed. Factors like null values and field types play a role. Null values still take time validate. Double or text fields take more memory than integers and slow sequential reads. Optimized storage using indexes and clever schemas helps.

Optimization Strategies

Simplify Formulas

Examine formulas for duplicate actions, unnecessary functions, and steps that can instead utilize native tools like Calculate Geometry. Leverage operations already built into Field Calculator like string concatenation and math operators before turning to FUNCTIONS. Initialize variables rather than evaluating the same expression repeatedly.

Create Intermediate Fields

Break field calculations into discrete steps stored in new fields instead of single complex statements. This simplifies logic, provides debugging visibility, and allows only updating rows when upstream fields change. derive area and perimeter in separate fields before calculating efficiency ratio in a third field for example. Create fields programmatically or manually.

Use Python Instead of VBScript

Python field calculations consistently outperform VBScript alternatives thanks to simplified syntax, native access to ArcPy site package modules and methods, background processing options, inline variable initialization, and vectorization tools like NumPy arrays. Replace complex VBScript formulas with streamlined Python equivalents if possible for better performance.

Run Field Calculator in Background

Encapsulate Python Field Calculator code in a function definition, then execute it against the target layer using CalculateField_management in background geoprocessing. This keeps the ArcMap interface responsive while calculations run asynchronously. Utilize messaging to monitor progress. Background calculation lets user continue other work during processing.

Create Spatial Indexes

Adding a spatial index to datasets underpinning Field Calculator operations can provide big speed gains. Spatial indexes changes how feature data sits on disk for faster spatial queries and geometry computations. Rebuilding datasets or enabling geoprocessing environments to create temporary spatial indexes dynamically expedites field updates.

Partition Data

Splitting data by geography or attributes using Definition Queries or other filters lets Field Calculator run against smaller chunks. Process partitions individually then Merge outputs for the full dataset. Partition strategically so work is evenly distributed across threads for parallelization. Or iterate through features manually in script tools for ultimate control.

Example Python Code for Faster Processing

Iterate Through Cursor

Stepping through cursor rows manually avoids table locking and facilitates custom handling of values. UpdateCursor inserts control structures like searching for nulls or handling errors gracefully without failing entire operation. Cursors also integrate with NumPy for array-based computations and accommodate multiprocessing for divides and conquer performance gains.

Use numpy Array Calculations

Levarage NumPy vectorization for faster math such as field minuses, concatenation, aggregates, statistics, and matrix operations. Array math circumvents slow Python for loops. Get NumPy arrays from da.SearchCursor using list then convert with np.array(). Operate on array then write back to new field with UpdateCursor. Drastic speedups for large numeric operations.

Call ArcPy Tools in Scripts

Embed Field Calculator sequences inside Python script tools to allow accessing ArcPy geoprocessing tools for environment control, intermediate outputs, leveraging 64-bit background processing, and more. Import modules like arcpy.na then call tools like Frequency, Summary Statistics, AddGeometryAttributes. Utilize result objects directly in subsequent processes. Avoid repeat calculations.

Conclusion – Balance Performance and Accuracy

By understanding common performance pitfalls and implementing key optimization techniques, GIS analysts can achieve faster Field Calculator execution without sacrificing output quality. The strategies discussed tackle slow speeds from different angles, be it formula complexity, storage inefficiencies, or raw dataset size. Applying even a couple recommendations yields measurable improvements, allowing practitioners to leverage the Field Calculator at scale.

However, efficiency cannot override accuracy in cases where precision and reliability are paramount. Performance-driven approaches like generalization, data reduction, and algorithm substitution can produce faster but unacceptable results for certain use cases. The recommendations in this guide are best applied judiciously, with testing and validation, rather than outright for all workflows. As in most things GIS, a balance must be struck between speed and quality tailored to the problem at hand.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *